CO129-515-9 Accessories and Abettors Ordinance 1929 20-2-1929 - 26-9-1929 — Page 10

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All

11.

Section 6 of this Ordinance re-enacts section 7

of Ordinance No. 3 of 1865.

10

5.

6.

Section 8 repeals Ordinance No. 3 of 1865.

On further

A draft bill was forwarded to the Secretary of State

under cover of Mr. Southorn's despatch of the 13th September,

1928, and was further elucidated in his despatch of the

27th November, 1928. The Secretary of State in his

despatch of the 24th April, 1929 agreed, with certain

reservations to the introduction of the bill.

consideration, however, it was decided to omit clauses

4, 7, 9, 11 and 12 of the draft bill, and they are not

included in the present Ordinance. With regard to clauses

4, 7, 9 and 11, it was felt that it would be dangerous

to make convictions in our courts depend, as they have

depended to some extent, on the practice and law of a

country where at present the line between political and

non-political offences is drawn less clearly than in

English law and practice. Experience in Chinese

extradition cases in our courts also points to another

objection, i.e., the frequent difficulty of obtaining

evidence from comparatively remote parts of the interior

and the impossibility in many cases of testing such

evidence. With regard to clause 12, it was considered not

clear that the first part would be intra vires the local

legislature, and it was thought that the second part of the

was

clause/by itself unnecessary.

7.

In my opinion this is an Ordinance to which His

Excellency the Governor may properly

of His Majesty and on His behalf.

assent in the name

Attorney General.

Page 10Page 11

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.